pam_limits again...

[Jan Rekorajski]

[piątek, 02 luty 2001], Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a):

> On/Dnia Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:41:08PM +0100, Jakub Bogusz wrote/napisał(a)
> 
> > It could be also fixed in glibc (as baggins proposed), but then we
> > should have separate glibc versions for kernel 2.2 and 2.4...
> I don't remember his posting about how to change (fix?) glibc. But why
> we need to fix glibc if it isn't broken?

It is. Glibc declares non existing limit - RLIMIT_LOCKS, it should
either not declare it when compiled/used with linux 2.2,
or take care for it in get/setlimits().

Janek
-- 
Jan Rękorajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio

________________________
http://lists.pld.org.pl/