glibc.spec and include files

Jan Rekorajski baggins-pld w sith.mimuw.edu.pl
Sob, 6 Sty 2001, 04:01:18 CET


[sobota, 06 styczeń 2001], Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a):

> I need clarification. Why in glibc.spec we have:
> 
> %{_includedir}/*.h
> %{_includedir}/arpa
[snip]
> 
> Instead of
> 
> %{_includedir}
> 
> ?
> 
> Due to this there is one bug on alpha -- missing %{_includedir}/alpha. The

It was there (at least in glibc 2.1):
%ifarch alpha
%{_includedir}/alpha
%endif

> second resolution (only %{_includedir}) will prevent from such problems.

No, because %{_includedir} comes from FHS,
and we'd have it owned by two packages.

Janek
-- 
Jan Rękorajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio



Więcej informacji o liście dyskusyjnej pld-devel-pl