glibc.spec and include files
Jan Rekorajski
baggins-pld w sith.mimuw.edu.pl
Sob, 6 Sty 2001, 04:01:18 CET
[sobota, 06 styczeń 2001], Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał(a):
> I need clarification. Why in glibc.spec we have:
>
> %{_includedir}/*.h
> %{_includedir}/arpa
[snip]
>
> Instead of
>
> %{_includedir}
>
> ?
>
> Due to this there is one bug on alpha -- missing %{_includedir}/alpha. The
It was there (at least in glibc 2.1):
%ifarch alpha
%{_includedir}/alpha
%endif
> second resolution (only %{_includedir}) will prevent from such problems.
No, because %{_includedir} comes from FHS,
and we'd have it owned by two packages.
Janek
--
Jan Rękorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
Więcej informacji o liście dyskusyjnej pld-devel-pl