lib/lib64 and mono
havner
havner at smtp.kamp.pl
Mon Feb 21 17:04:02 CET 2005
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:04:29PM +0100, Michal Moskal wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 01:48:24PM +0100, Michal Moskal wrote:
> > I ask this because of mono. It by default puts its *.so/*.a/*.la files
> > where it is told with --libdir. And its OK. However it also installs
> > /usr/lib/mono directory with .NET libraries (*.dll) and executables
> > (*.exe). They are architecture independent. However in case you mono --aot
> > them (for faster loading), you get foo.dll.so in addition to foo.dll,
> > which clearly *is* architecture dependent. mono-install.patch makes
> > /usr/lib/mono go to /usr/lib64/mono.
>
> Mono developers accepted this patch, so /usr/lib64/mono will hopefully
> no longer be PLD-specific[1]. Therefore this configuration is more likely
> to work with third party packages.
>
> > I propose to put mono directory in /usr/lib even on 64 bit systems.
>
> So please disregard.
>
> [1] I hope that the entire /usr/lib64 thing on amd64 isn't PLD-specific?
afaik it's not
--
Regards Havner {jid,mail}:havner(at)pld-linux.org
PLD developer && PLD 2.0 release manager http://www.pld-linux.org
PLD LiveCD author http://livecd.pld-linux.org
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list