SPECS: apache1.spec - Provide apache-modname for each module - swa...

Radoslaw Zielinski radek at karnet.pl
Tue Feb 22 10:49:26 CET 2005


Elan Ruusamäe <glen at delfi.ee> [22-02-2005 00:03]:
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 12:44, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
>> I have put some effort to get rid of the apache vs apache1 confusion.
>> ``Provides: %{%{name}_of_another_package}'' in a package with different
>> functionality is a Bad Thing.
> there's similiar issue with php. and it's accepted

> packages have dependancies like
> Requires: php-extensiona >= 4.1.0
> Requires: php-extensionb >= 4.1.0

> and php4 does provide php-extension

Same issue exists with perl (and I have introduced it myself); hovewer,
it's different than the "apache{,1}" one (most important difference: it
doesn't really matter, whether perl-modules or perl-Time-HiRes will be
installed).

Yes, it creates problems -- arising from RPM's crappiness.   I don't see
a way for solving this issue without using a chainsaw.

-- 
Radosław Zieliński <radek at karnet.pl>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20050222/d59f9c90/attachment-0002.bin


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list