cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

[Jan Rekorajski]

On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:24 +0200, djurban wrote:
> > Author: djurban                      Date: Tue Sep  6 16:24:57 2005 GMT
> > Module: SOURCES                       Tag: HEAD
> > ---- Log message:
> > - from ghostscript.spec's HEAD
> > - lost the logs, but i dont have time to mail the commands for all those files to cvs admins
> [...]
> 
> let's start new war...
> 
> what about moving repo to svn?

Forget it. SVN is really poor choice for SPECS/SOURCES.
Besides, its taging/branching scheme just sucks client-side.

Janek
-- 
Jan Rękorajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio