cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

[Adam Gołębiowski]

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:50PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:24 +0200, djurban wrote:
> > Author: djurban                      Date: Tue Sep  6 16:24:57 2005 GMT
> > Module: SOURCES                       Tag: HEAD
> > ---- Log message:
> > - from ghostscript.spec's HEAD
> > - lost the logs, but i dont have time to mail the commands for all those files to cvs admins
> [...]
> 
> let's start new war...
> 
> what about moving repo to svn?

Nice try ;)

(Probably) Too much effort, (probably) not enough gain. 

Why? 
Svn cp/mv, or atomic commits aren't crucial for me. 

And oh, I'd miss those 1.441.2.1178 style revisions :)

-- 
http://www.mysza.eu.org/ | Everybody needs someone sure, someone true,
   PLD Linux developer   | Everybody needs some solid rock, I know I do.