sending build requests for th, a proposal of rules

[wrobell]

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:57:19AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 13 April 2006 10:02, wrobell wrote:
[...]
> 
> >
> > 2. if you want to send a package to builders, then _build_ and _run_ it
> >    on your machine first. this means, that if soname changes then
> >    it is sender responsibility to rebuild or other dependant packages.
> >
> >    if you have no time for soname play, then don't send a request to
> >    builders. if you are in middle of the process and your cat needs
> >    you, then ask other developer to finish the job.
> >
> >    if it involves a lot of time (i.e. openssl), then tell people on
> >    the list about it.
> There are two packages currently with soname changes. expat and openssl. expat 
> case isn't yet clear and rebuilding stuff for openssl and then again for 
> expat would be stupid. So openssl has to wait. It didn't upgrade on builders 
> so what the problem?

speaking about openssl and th it is not a problem, now. :)

openssl was just an example. if you have your plan then it is ok.
eventually, just let us know what is going to happen.

let's be flexible.

[...]

    wrobell <wrobell at pld-linux.org>