packages: perl-Clutter-GStreamer/perl-Clutter-GStreamer.spec -

[ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl]

=?UTF-8?B?UmFkb3PFgmF3IFppZWxpxYRza2k=?= wrote:
> 
> 2010/6/8  <ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl>:
> > RPM's Release is and have to be our internal number, not the upstream one.
> > Any "release" that is external to us have to go to the "Version" field in
> > some way.
> 
> Well, that's not how we've been doing things so far.  betaX, alphaX,
> rcX, snapshots, whatever -- it all usually goes to Release.

Yes, but it is for 0.X.Y Release format.
And Y is the part still under our controll.
 
> And I don't see a way of doing this without frequent Epoch bumps.

What would be nice to avoid. Especially as rpm does not like multiple
packages with same Version-Release. Even if Epoch is bumped.

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz                  ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl