license of patches in cvs

[Mathieu Doidy]

++ 25/01/04 - maHo:
> undefine at aramin.net:
> >I'm not sure, but when there is no info in a patch, patches are GPL-ed
> >(http://cvs.pld-linux.org/SPECS/COPYING)
> >All files on CVS/SOURCES/distfiles are distributable, so You can use it
> >how You wish :)
> >Many patches are taked from other distros - and have informations about
> >it in cvs logs.
> >When You need information from autor ask people which add this file to
> >cvs:
> > 
> >
>    this is my patch. you can assume this as GPL code. hoever, I don't 
> know if there is legal way to release non GPL patch to GPL project. IMHO 
> patch to esd is derived code from esd, so has the same license as esd.
> 
>   BTW: I'have sent that patch to gnome bugzilla. IIRC they changed it a 
> bit(autoconf/automake stuff) and applied to their repository. So check 
> also their cvs.
> 
> tegards
> 
> maHo

ok, thanks
i've seen the bugzilla page for that bug and they seem to indeed have included
it in the sources

i'll use your patch as long as the next version of esound (0.2.33 ?) is not
released

bye

  /mathieu