__ in rpm macros
jajcus at pld.org.pl
Wed May 22 20:49:44 CEST 2002
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:44:32PM +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > I guess it would be better to use %automake and %autoconf (and maybe
> > %make).
> Not so neccessary. We do not write C code ;) ... but seems you are right :)
> Comment from /usr/lib/rpm/macros:
> # Macro naming conventions (preliminary):
> # Macros that begin with an underscore are "local" in the sense that
> # they (if used) will not be exported in rpm headers. Some macros
> # that don't start with an underscore (but look like they should)
> # are compatible with macros generated by rpm-2.5.x and will be made
> # more consistent in a future release.
> So probaly will be good add:
Do we need %automake and such exported in rpm headers???? No. We only
need them expanded while executing spec file. So, if I understand the
text above well, you are wrong.
More information about the pld-devel-en