Shouldn't glibc-devel r: kernel-headers?

Michal Moskal malekith at
Sat Oct 12 15:07:31 CEST 2002

On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 01:53:20PM +0200, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> On Friday 11 October 2002 23:37, Michal Moskal wrote:
> > Glibc references some <asm/*.h> files. They are in kernel-headers
> > package. Shouldn't therefore glibc-devel require kernel-headers?
> I thought about it too (I stumbled across this yesterday when something didn't 
> want to build although all BuildRequires were met). Wouldn't it be ok to just 
> provide a kernel-fake.noarch.rpm for people not using disto kernel?

I guess this is better idea then hacks with %{?_without_dist_kernel:...}
all over the specs.

Anyway I heard somewhere about moving <asm/*> to glibc-devel (in rh, or
somewhere). Wouldn't that be a good idea?

: Michal Moskal ::::: malekith/at/ :  GCS {C,UL}++++$ a? !tv
: PLD Linux ::::::: Wroclaw University, CS Dept :  {E-,w}-- {b++,e}>+++ h

More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list