RFC: spec preprocessor

[Artur Frysiak]

W liście z nie, 18-05-2003, godz. 23:44, Jakub Bogusz pisze: 
> Lack of nested comments was more disturbing.
> 
Nasted comments ? You mean: nasted %ifs ? 
This is posible with rpm 4.3-snap.

> Maybe implementing %ifdef and %ifndef (to be used instead of
> 0%{?...:1} and 0%{!?...:1}) would be worth... but it would make many
> specs incompatible with rpm from Ra :/

%ifdef and %ifndef .... hmm, look in rpm-list archive for jbj
proposition about implementing it as macro (with sample implementation).

Regards
-- 
Artur Frysiak <wiget at pld.org.pl>