RFC: spec preprocessor

Jakub Bogusz qboosh at pld.org.pl
Tue May 20 10:56:17 CEST 2003

On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Artur Frysiak wrote:
> W liście z nie, 18-05-2003, godz. 23:44, Jakub Bogusz pisze: 
> > Lack of nested comments was more disturbing.
> > 
> Nasted comments ? You mean: nasted %ifs ? 
> This is posible with rpm 4.3-snap.

I saw it in spec - that's the reason I wrote "was", not "is" :)
(but I haven't installed this version yet)

> > Maybe implementing %ifdef and %ifndef (to be used instead of
> > 0%{?...:1} and 0%{!?...:1}) would be worth... but it would make many
> > specs incompatible with rpm from Ra :/
> %ifdef and %ifndef .... hmm, look in rpm-list archive for jbj
> proposition about implementing it as macro (with sample implementation).

Is the archive accessible to non-members?

>From http://www.rpm.org/ I've found only:

"The current archive is only available to the list members."

"Page Not Found (404)"

Jakub Bogusz    http://cyber.cs.net.pl/~qboosh/

More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list