ANN: Closing AC

[Marcin Król]

> Well... we can see Ac as such development tree for gcc/glibc transition
> after Ra. Ac hasn't been released yet not because it was too early to
> release something new, but because it was never considered complete...

The truth for me is that Ac wasn't released yet because most of us are 
developing it in our free time, but thats a different story and OT :)

> BTW, does Ac have all packages that Ra did

Probably not.

> or proper set of Obsoletes now?

Same here.

I don't have list of missing packages or list of missing obsoletes, but 
few times I wasn't able to find substitute for some packages. That was a 
looong time ago, though. I remember at least mirrordir and cvs-admin, 
but I think its good those two are gone :)

> Ra->Ac isn't too hard on simple configurations...
> Just a few transitions ;)

It isn't hard at all, its just time consuming ;) However I like to sit 
in server room at night. Noone is bothering me, no phones, no users, 
loud music, pizza... ;)

> With 2 sets of builders, when some new transition occur before some
> older is complete - they cumulate, and require more time.
> And later require more admin attention when performing upgrade.
> Effect could be just like waiting for Ac after Ra release...

One builder set per transition then? But I don't think we will start 
developing ie. gcc 5.5 before finishing 5.0. It would be just waste of 
resources.

> "Your architecture disappeared. You don't exist, go away." ;)

ROTFL! Thats a good one :)

M.