cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

[Paweł Sakowski]

On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
> 
> [baggins at sith rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES SPECS 
> 959M    SOURCES
> 63M     SPECS

Obviously svn makes no sense with such file organization (in two
directories). To allow reasonable branching, each package would have to
have a directory of its own. Which is a good idea anyway, but probably
it's not worth changing now.

-- 
Paweł Sakowski <saq at pld-linux.org>
PLD Linux Distribution