cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

[Jakub Piotr Cłapa]

Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> 
>>At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
>>
>>[baggins at sith rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES SPECS 
>>959M    SOURCES
>>63M     SPECS
> 
> 
> Obviously svn makes no sense with such file organization (in two
> directories). To allow reasonable branching, each package would have to
> have a directory of its own. Which is a good idea anyway, but probably
> it's not worth changing now.

But it would be a really big problem for people like qboosh. Probably 
the best choice would be to design something ourselves. ;-)

-- 
Regards,
Jakub Piotr Cłapa