cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW),

[Andrzej Krzysztofowicz]

Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
> > > 
> > > [baggins at sith rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES SPECS 
> > > 959M    SOURCES
> > > 63M     SPECS
> > 
> > Obviously svn makes no sense with such file organization (in two
> > directories). To allow reasonable branching, each package would have to
> > have a directory of its own. Which is a good idea anyway, but probably
> > it's not worth changing now.
> 
> How would I make "cvs up SPECS" (without getting any SOURCES) then?

/me would like also to do sth like:

rsync -a some-rsync-pld-server::cvs/SPECS

(and minimizing network activity while doing this, of course)

-- 
=======================================================================
  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz               ankry at mif.pg.gda.pl
  phone (48)(58) 347 14 61
Faculty of Applied Phys. & Math.,   Gdansk University of Technology