wrobell at pld-linux.org
Tue Aug 7 15:53:43 CEST 2007
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:34:33PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On 8/7/07, wrobell <wrobell at pld-linux.org> wrote:
> > current vim shall not be "full". for very long period of time there were no
> > complaints because of vim "non-fullness" if i remember well :]
> I use a custom build with python.
well.. me too, so maybe you and me should create vim-python package.
> > maybe everyone is on holidays now, but it seems that switching off
> > languages is ok for now. if somebody needs all of them, then... vim-full?
> Why switch off all languages?
imho, nobody needs such cow (see my first e-mail, please). i really do not
see why i should have ruby (or tcl) installed for vim only. and if i reckon
well we do not have any package in CVS, which uses ruby on vim level. for
python you have at least bicyclerepairman.
> Minimalistic vim is called vim-static.
but i do not want minimalistic vim.
wrobell <wrobell at pld-linux.org>
More information about the pld-devel-en