vim languages

[Jakub Bogusz]

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:31:48PM +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> > > > > any comments?
> > > > The basic packages should be 'low reqs' and 'high reqs' (which
> > > > translates to -- no langs and all langs). Anything in between should be
> > > > left to ppl directly interested.
> > >
> > > "All-or-nothing" isn't the best choice...
> > > I think that there should be 3 possibilities:
> > > - vim like in current packages we know. It would be nice to keep it.
> > > - vim-tiny (or minimal) - for monks
> > > - vim-full - for those who like all the bells and whistles
> > What's the difference between current vim and vim-full?
> 
> AFAIR current vim has only perl enabled by default.
> Or only perl was enabled some time ago...

So maybe let's enable perl and python, keeping tcl and ruby disabled
until someone proves that (s)he really needs them.


-- 
Jakub Bogusz    http://qboosh.pl/