broken pl LC_TIME

Tomasz Pala gotar at polanet.pl
Fri Jun 22 11:20:58 CEST 2007


On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > 
> > Exactly. There's absolutely no reason to use roman numbers. The most
> > common and proper way is [day].mm.yyyy (day<10 with or without leading
> 
> Numeric mm is NOT month name _abbreviayion_.

Yep. Roman numeric neither. These abbreviations don't exist thus we use
numbers. Arabic numbers.

> Intention is clearly explained in bugzilla references.

And it's wrong.

> IMO I/II/III is better than sty/lut/mar.

Roman numbers ARE NOT abbreviations. They are obsoleted form of writing
dates in numeric.

> But maybe yhey all should have trailing/leading spaces to keep fixed length.

We should not follow grammar from '70s.

-- 
Tom Pala <gotar at pld-linux.org>           http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/
                                         http://tccs.sourceforge.net/


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list