[Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć ten błąd?]

[Elan Ruusamäe]

On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> > and if you definition of stable is old packages, why bother upgrading
> > packages from ac-updates afterall?
>
> updates was intended to security, bugfix updates. whats the difference
> between ac/ti/th when you can update everything?? Maybe let's update RA
> to kernel 2.6.25

point me to the document where's written what for was intended purpose of 
ac-updates. however having just updates or just security won't work as 
updated packages depend on each other, so you end up needing for package in 
general a package security tree or vice versa.

and easiest way to fix security issues is upgrade software, to catch up the 
patch from upstream. i haven't noticed active security team to patch and 
backport changes to old versions in pld. we don't have such developer power 
(and apparently no interest either) like debian does.

-- 
glen