[Fwd: Re: [Th] Upgrade apport - jak rozumieć ten błąd?]

Elan Ruusamäe glen at delfi.ee
Wed Apr 9 21:53:03 CEST 2008


On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:44, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:03, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> >>> and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's
> >>> need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it
> >>> was released. and some major changes like updating glibc or gcc would
> >>> mean changing the distro, i.e dropping some architectures and 2.4
> >>> kernel compatability.
> >>
> >> What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel??
> >> Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help
> >> Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features?
> >> upgrade kernel for desktops in AC - useless
> >
> > explain?
>
> If I have new machine I wont install AC. Give me one reason to do so and
> not to install Ti(or Th)
my reasons might not be valid for you.

> If I have old machine with AC - it is working what's the point of
> upgrading kernel?
don't touch it then. nobody is making (at least from pld side) you to do 
anything with it.

> As I said before, why not upgrading RA packages for security/features
> reason - I have 2 RA servers well working and dont want to migrate them.

nobody is interested in doing  that. see http://www.pld-linux.org/ under "26 
April 2006 PLD 1.0/1.1 (Ra) information" section. you can be the one.

-- 
glen


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list