SPECS: perl-Template-Toolkit.spec - release 4: giving up for

[Radoslaw Zielinski]

Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl> [17-02-2008 18:40]:
> Radoslaw Zielinski wrote:
>> Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <ankry at green.mif.pg.gda.pl> [17-02-2008 17:41]:
>>> radek wrote:
>>>> -%{?with_tests:%{__make} test}
>>>> +%{?with_tests:%{__make} test ||:}
>>> If we ignore test errors so what is the point of performing the tests?
>> We can see the results and are able to interpret them (known / new failures).
> I am afraid nobody cares for result if a package builds succesfully. The
> results are analyzed only if build fails.

Agreed for most of the packages; however, TT belongs to the "critical"
group.  This *will* be fixed, sooner or later.

> IMO if you want to follow this way the only solution is to filter out
> acceptable results in %build and fail if there is anything else.
> Possibly too much work. Better is disabling tests by default with a comment.

Too much work indeed.  Yet the information from half-off tests might
be useful, and the cost of having it there is neglible.

-- 
Radosław Zieliński <radek at pld-linux.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-en/attachments/20080217/1b1f17d2/attachment.sig