Packaging .py files

Bartosz Taudul wolf.pld at gmail.com
Thu Jul 17 21:35:54 CEST 2008


On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 07:47:31PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> I'm against
> being forced to do something counter-productive in order to get some
I'm against being forced to have some shit installed on my computer that
only some lazy developer needs.

> In other words - we are one of the most limited distros when it comes
> to resources.
We will surely have more people power if we start lowering quality and
blending with other distros.

> Pursuing a dream is one thing but we should not be
> forced to do it. I'm not sure I want to lose my job for the sake of
> saving the world.
Since when does PLD care about your job (or mine)? Saying that your
personal needs should come before general distros needs is extremely
arrogant IMO.

> I want to be able to easily install a package and
> get the goddamn python sources.
So install your python debuginfo equivalent and stop bitching. Why
should everyone be forced to have your crap, when they're just fine with
already compiled bytecode?

> Sure pydoc is useful but it's only
> useful to the extent man is - you have to know the name of the
> function in which case you probably don't need pydoc anymore (API
> changes or implementation details that change but some coder decided
> to rely on).
Yes, yes, very interesting. I will start packaging all the sources of
C libraries into main packages then, just so I can check if the code
really, *really*, *REALLY* does what the documentation and/or man pages
say. That's my favourite pastime activity, you know. I do it for the
kicks.

wolf
-- 
  Bartek   .  
  Taudul   :  
          .:....................................................................
w o l f @ p l d - l i n u x . o r g            .:. http://wolf.valkyrie.one.pl/


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list