recent java changes (enforcing gcj)

Paweł Zuzelski z at xatka.net
Tue Mar 24 07:08:58 CET 2009


On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Jakub Bogusz wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 03:49:54PM +0100, Paweł Zuzelski wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > 
> > > There should be a way to build packages using jdk - without need to
> > > uninstall java-sun and replace it with gcj - e.g. by %bcond_with jdk.
> > 
> > IMO we should enforce a specified implemetation of jdk even
> > for packages that can be build using both jdks, because package
> > built with java-sun differ from the same package built with
> > java-gcj-compat-devel.
> 
> By default - yes.
> But it should be possible to build using java-sun by (explicitly) using
> some bcond.

Yes, that is true. I have added such bcond to some java packages
and I will add it to all of them.

> [...]
> > > Also, removing versioned jre Requires doesn't look good to me - the
> > > required versions were put not without reason.
> > 
> > This dependency should be autogenerated and it should look like
> > that: R: java(ClassDataVersion) = n
> (+further explanation in next posting)
> 
> This is jvm.
> But particular version of jre contains also set of libraries with
> matching versions - and it can be something that versioned jre
> dependencies could cover.

OK. I'll check it out.

BTW thanks for comments.

-- 
Paweł


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list