cvs mv/cp?

[Zsolt Udvari]

Doesn't need "Provides: ruby-Package" into "ruby-package.spec"? Why?
Because of many other package, that have ruby-Package BRs and Rs.

Zsolt

2010/2/27 Jan Rękorajski <baggins at sith.mimuw.edu.pl>:
> Hi,
> I'm going to clean up ruby packages, and as it involves a lot of renames,
> I wonder what is out current policy on 'cvs mv'.
>
> Are we still playing with server-side copy and client side remove?
>
> I'd much prefer to just 'mv' thing server side, like this:
> mv old-package-name new-package-name
> mv old-package-name/old-package-name.spec,v new-package-name/new-package-name.spec,v
>
> anyone against?
>
> --
> Jan Rękorajski            |  ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
> baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl   |  OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
> BOFH, MANIAC              |                   -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
>