python3.2+ compiled files

Jeff Johnson n3npq at
Sun Apr 3 15:07:41 CEST 2011

On Apr 3, 2011, at 9:00 AM, ankry at wrote:

> Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> Another approach would be to not bother with static *.py* content
>> packaged in *.rpm at all, but rather let python establish its own
>> format/implementation for install/upgrade/erase of python code.
> This approach would break the main PLD rule: that all binaries present in
> the system are registered in the rpm database.

rules == rules

So teach python to do a registration. That's already being
done with pubkeys and rpm --import: create a header, call rpmdbAdd().

73 de Jeff

More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list