python3.2+ compiled files

ankry at ankry at
Sun Apr 3 15:00:40 CEST 2011

Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Another approach would be to not bother with static *.py* content
> packaged in *.rpm at all, but rather let python establish its own
> format/implementation for install/upgrade/erase of python code.

This approach would break the main PLD rule: that all binaries present in
the system are registered in the rpm database.

  Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz                  ankry at

More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list