python3.2+ compiled files
Jakub Bogusz
qboosh at pld-linux.org
Fri May 20 16:31:23 CEST 2011
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:34:44PM +0200, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 06:08:31PM +0100, Artur Wroblewski wrote:
> > There is also
> >
> > http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/jA6s9GD0sh2vKRhR2zat
> >
> > to study.
> >
> > We could also think about zipping of the modules later...
> >
> > Anyway, if no one objects then I will finish packaging of Python 3.2
> > during the weekend using source files and __pycache__.
> >
> > Is that OK?
>
> I guess this is a must, anyway...
>
> The problem is that will probably require fixing lots of python-*.spec
> files which have:
>
> ...../*.py[co]
>
> in their files. That will have to be changed to *.py and __pycache__
> added. Maybe we should have some automation for packaging (or not
> packaging) __pycache__ and its contents? So it doesn't have to be listed
> explicitly for every python package. I am thinking about something like
> %find_lang - e.g. %find_pybytcode, or '%py_listmodules modul1e module2'
Actually it refers only to python3-* packages, not all python-*.spec.
--
Jakub Bogusz http://qboosh.pl/
More information about the pld-devel-en
mailing list