rpm 5.x in Th

[Jeffrey Johnson]

On Sep 23, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Tomasz Pala <gotar at polanet.pl> wrote:

> 
> Well, I might be wrong, but I think Lukasz expects something like
> rpm -Uvh /var/spool/repackage/[date range reversed]*/* --force --nomd5
> only - i.e. not actual transactions rollback, but package set restore
> (in proper order, thus preserving dependencies).
> 

One might expect whatever outcome one wishes …
\
> Restoring filesystem state (including things altered by triggers etc.)
> is indeed dm/filesystem/backup software job and there's no point simulating
> it on one more level.
> 

… but triggers are executed as part of package management,
changing file system state, and are not simply invertible.

I do not understand your distinction.

How is --rollback to be performed if operations are
only partially reversed?

73 de Jeff