MIT kerberos vs heimdal

[Jan Rękorajski]

On Sat, 07 Feb 2015, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:

> On Saturday 07 of February 2015, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > Anyone knows/remembers why did we choose heimdal over MIT? 
> 
> IPv6 support I guess.

That was old reason, last time I checked MIT did not have LDAP
and Samba support. Also no Samba flavor ever built with MIT,
and that's crucial now Samba is a real AD server. Just read README.dc
from Fedora's samba package, it's so pathetic it still makes me
laugh my ass off.
That were the reasons we switched to Heimdal.

-- 
Jan Rękorajski                    | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | baggins<at>pld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/