MIT kerberos vs heimdal
baggins at pld-linux.org
Sat Feb 7 17:38:39 CET 2015
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote:
> On Saturday 07 of February 2015, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> > Anyone knows/remembers why did we choose heimdal over MIT?
> IPv6 support I guess.
That was old reason, last time I checked MIT did not have LDAP
and Samba support. Also no Samba flavor ever built with MIT,
and that's crucial now Samba is a real AD server. Just read README.dc
from Fedora's samba package, it's so pathetic it still makes me
laugh my ass off.
That were the reasons we switched to Heimdal.
Jan Rękorajski | PLD/Linux
SysAdm | baggins<at>pld-linux.org | http://www.pld-linux.org/
More information about the pld-devel-en