[sobota, 30 grudzień 2000], Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:17:39PM +0100, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > [piątek, 29 grudzień 2000], Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> > > > Revision 1.152 2000/12/28 14:58:13 baggins
> > > > - buildrequires not gd-devel, but gd-static and libpng-static :(
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > Because.
> > glibc-memusage package won't build without them. We must do something
> > with it (hint, hint, wiget ;>)
>
> OK, I know why gd and libpng - but why static not devel?
> I built glibc from old spec, having:
>
> $ rpm -q gd-devel libpng-devel gd-static libpng-static
> gd-devel-1.8.3-6
> libpng-devel-1.0.8-1
> package gd-static is not installed
> package libpng-static is not installed
Weird, I couldn't :o I had problems when rpm started parsing %files,
it looked like memusege was not built. I think we need someone to confirm
if it's my problem or if you are lucky.
> > > PS [off-topic] XFree86 won't build if CONFIG_AGP or CONFIG_AGP_MODULE is
> > > not defined in <linux/autoconf.h>... (stops during compilation of ATI Rage
> > > 128 DRM driver).
> >
> > Queued, I'll fix it ;)
>
> Next:
>
> Name: XFree86-fonts
> Version: 4.0.2
> ^^^^^
> Source0: ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.0/source/X401src-2.tgz
> Source1: ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/4.0/source/X401src-1.tgz
> ^^^^
Aaarrrrggghh. I think you may now understand why I ranted at Wojtek.
> Patch0: %{name}-extras-fix.patch
> Patch1: %{name}-ISO8859-2.patch
>
> After s/X401/X402/ both patches are rejected.
Will fix.
Janek
--
Jan Rękorajski | ALL SUSPECTS ARE GUILTY. PERIOD!
baggins<at>mimuw.edu.pl | OTHERWISE THEY WOULDN'T BE SUSPECTS, WOULD THEY?
BOFH, MANIAC | -- TROOPS by Kevin Rubio