pam_limits again...

Jakub Bogusz qboosh w prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl
Pią, 2 Lut 2001, 20:51:18 CET


On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:41:06PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On/Dnia Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:39:37PM +0100, Jan Rekorajski wrote/napisał(a)
> > Where exactly pam_limits will not work? It will have no idea about
> > LIMIT_NLOCKS, but all others will work on both 2.2 _and_ 2.4.
> Others yes but not LIMIT_NLOCKS. If you modiffy pam_limits then we
> will have working all limits on all kernels. There only won't be
> error checking for get/setrlimit for LIMIT_NLOCKS.

For now, pam_limits doesn't support RLIMIT_LOCKS at all.

But what when it does?
IMO run-time detection if system supports RLIMIT_LOCKS would be better
than compile-time...


-- 
Jakub Bogusz
http://prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl/~qboosh/

________________________
http://lists.pld.org.pl/



Więcej informacji o liście dyskusyjnej pld-devel-pl