packages: ncurses/ncurses.spec - make it build on Titanium, try

[Arkadiusz Miskiewicz]

On Tuesday 02 of February 2010, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?= wrote:
> > 2010/2/2 Elan Ruusamäe <glen w pld-linux.org>:
> > > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 16:04:46 shadzik wrote:
> > >> Author: shadzik
> 
> [...]
> 
> > >> +%if "%{pld_release}" != "ti"
> > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.6
> > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.*.*
> > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.5
> > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.*.*
> > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.5
> > >> +%else
> > >> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.5
> > >> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libncursesw.so.5
> > >> +%endif
> > > 
> > > this has exceeded sane amount of the nesting level of ifdefs, please
> > > move the branch specific spec to a dedicated branch, both branches be
> > > nicer and more easier to update. there isn't so much changes in a spec
> > > that such complexity of following the conditions (to verify nothing
> > > got broken after a change) pays off.
> > > 
> > > same applies to openssl.spec
> > 
> > This is the way Hawk told me to deal with such problems - exactly not
> > to have dozens of branches - therefore I'm dealing with them that way.
> > Two or three more conditions doesn't make it less readable. Request
> > rejected.
> 
> CDG ?

CDG to deal with private pld branches? Is this a joke?

-- 
Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz        PLD/Linux Team
arekm / maven.pl            http://ftp.pld-linux.org/