packages: ncurses/ncurses.spec - make it build on Titanium, try

[Paweł Zuzelski]

On Tue, 02 Feb 2010, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:

> On Tuesday 02 of February 2010, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> > =?UTF-8?B?QmFydG9zeiDFmndpxIV0ZWs=?= wrote:
> > > 2010/2/2 Elan Ruusamäe <glen w pld-linux.org>:
> > > > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 16:04:46 shadzik wrote:
> > > >> Author: shadzik
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > >> +%if "%{pld_release}" != "ti"
> > > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.6
> > > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.*.*
> > > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libncursesw.so.5
> > > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.*.*
> > > >>  %attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libtinfow.so.5
> > > >> +%else
> > > >> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libtinfow.so.5
> > > >> +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost /%{_lib}/libncursesw.so.5
> > > >> +%endif
> > > > 
> > > > this has exceeded sane amount of the nesting level of ifdefs, please
> > > > move the branch specific spec to a dedicated branch, both branches be
> > > > nicer and more easier to update. there isn't so much changes in a spec
> > > > that such complexity of following the conditions (to verify nothing
> > > > got broken after a change) pays off.
> > > > 
> > > > same applies to openssl.spec
> > > 
> > > This is the way Hawk told me to deal with such problems - exactly not
> > > to have dozens of branches - therefore I'm dealing with them that way.
> > > Two or three more conditions doesn't make it less readable. Request
> > > rejected.
> > 
> > CDG ?
> 
> CDG to deal with private pld branches? Is this a joke?

HEAD is not a private pld branch.

-- 
Paweł