rpm 5.x in Th

[Jeffrey Johnson]

On Sep 23, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Tomasz Pala wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 17:45:08 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> 
>>> The data is not gone - it exists in repackage. The _only_ thing that's
>>> missing is some syntax sugar to ease downgrades.
>> 
>> It doesn't exist in /var/spool/repackage if not enabled,
>> or when bloat has been manually removed.
> 
> Or when the earth is hit by a meteor.
> That's not the case we're talking about. That's funny you still can't
> understant, that:
> 
> he - wants - to - 'rollback' - using - his - repackages. ONLY
> 

troll++

>> So don't use ACID-style rollback. Alternatively,
> 
> Which one, this broken?
> 

troll++

>> You are a deluded idiot claiming that RPM --rollback
>> is false advertising.
> 
> Oh, so it was deliberately designed to break, right?
> 

troll++

Get a grip: PLD decided to upgrade to rpm-5.4.x.

Now you can all bugger off …

73 de Jeff
> -- 
> Tomasz Pala <gotar at pld-linux.org>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en