rpm 5.x in Th

Tomasz Pala gotar at polanet.pl
Mon Sep 24 00:18:46 CEST 2012


In this episode...

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 18:03:06 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:

>> he - wants - to - 'rollback' - using - his - repackages. ONLY
> 
> troll++

...Jeff-the-Omniscient knows better what user wanted to acomplish!

>>> So don't use ACID-style rollback. Alternatively,
>> 
>> Which one, this broken?
> 
> troll++

...Jeff-almighty can run broken code!

>>> You are a deluded idiot claiming that RPM --rollback
>>> is false advertising.
>> 
>> Oh, so it was deliberately designed to break, right?
> 
> troll++
> 
> Get a grip: PLD decided to upgrade to rpm-5.4.x.

So is it broken or not?

> Now you can all bugger off ?

Last time I've checked we were on PLD maillist not rpm one, so if anyone
it's you who should go fuck himself.

-- 
Tomasz Pala <gotar at pld-linux.org>


More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list