rpm 5.x in Th

[Jeffrey Johnson]

On Sep 23, 2012, at 6:18 PM, Tomasz Pala <gotar at polanet.pl> wrote:

> In this episode...
> 
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 18:03:06 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> 
>>> he - wants - to - 'rollback' - using - his - repackages. ONLY
>> 
>> troll++
> 
> ...Jeff-the-Omniscient knows better what user wanted to accomplish!

(troll++)++

>>>> So don't use ACID-style rollback. Alternatively,
>>> 
>>> Which one, this broken?
>> 
>> troll++
> 
> ...Jeff-almighty can run broken code!
> 

(troll++)++

>>>> You are a deluded idiot claiming that RPM --rollback
>>>> is false advertising.
>>> 
>>> Oh, so it was deliberately designed to break, right?
>> 
>> troll++
>> 
>> Get a grip: PLD decided to upgrade to rpm-5.4.x.
> 
> So is it broken or not?
> 

Depends on whether you were born a bastard (or not). I do
not know you genealogy sufficiently well to say whether
it is broken or not ...

>> Now you can all bugger off ?
> 
> Last time I've checked we were on PLD maillist not rpm one, so if anyone
> it's you who should go fuck himself.
> 

troll++

73 de Jeff

> -- 
> Tomasz Pala <gotar at pld-linux.org>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel-en at lists.pld-linux.org
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en