ERRORS: rpm.spec

Elan Ruusamäe glen at pld-linux.org
Tue Jan 10 18:56:34 CET 2017


On 10.01.2017 19:46, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> I will (at least) send the patch to re-add RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE to pld-devel@
> when I remove the data type. The RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE has always been broken in RPM
> because the type is sometimes a scalar, and sometimes a vector, depending on the desired
> access context.

(without understanding what the RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE problem or change is)
is it possible with simple #define get same behaviour that 5.4.15 has?

from your post i understand RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE is still there in 
5.4.16/5.4.17

-- 
glen



More information about the pld-devel-en mailing list